in Re: Randolfo Castillo, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 2010·No. 13-10-00046-CV·Published

Opinion



NUMBER 13-10-00046-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG



IN RE: RANDOLFO CASTILLO, M.D.


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



Relator, Randolfo Castillo, M.D., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief in the above cause on February 4, 2010. That same day, the Court requested that the real parties in interest, State Farm Lloyds, David Hasley, Danny D. Christensen, and Ronald Rudolfo Castillo, file responses to: (1) relator's petition for writ of mandamus, and (2) relator's emergency motion for temporary relief. Such responses have been duly filed.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



PER CURIAM



Delivered and filed

the 8th day of March, 2010.



1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Randolfo Castillo, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re: Randolfo Castillo, M.D. (in Re: Randolfo Castillo, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.