In re Ramunno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ramunno

202 A.D.2d 511, 609 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2442

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered March 2, 1992, which granted the petitioner’s application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the petitioner was prevented from seeking out the aid of counsel and from having a notice of claim served timely by reason of the severity of the injuries he sustained in the accident complained of (see, Morano v County of Dutchess, [512]*512160 AD2d 690; Matter of Savelli v City of New York, 104 AD2d 943, 944). The extensive injuries received by the petitioner as well as the various therapies which were needed caused him to be more concerned with his own emotional and physical health than in maintaining an action to receive compensation (see, Morano v County of Dutchess, supra). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, Pagan v New York City Hous. Auth., 166 AD2d 390). Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered March 2, 1992, which granted the petitioner’s application.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the petitioner was prevented from seeking out the aid of counsel and from having a notice of claim served timely by reason of the severity of the injuries he sustained in the accident complained of (see, Morano v County of Dutchess, [512]*512160 AD2d 690; Matter of Savelli v City of New York, 104 AD2d 943, 944). The extensive injuries received by the petitioner as well as the various therapies which were needed caused him to be more concerned with his own emotional and physical health than in maintaining an action to receive compensation (see, Morano v County of Dutchess, supra). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting leave to serve a late notice of claim (see, Pagan v New York City Hous. Auth., 166 AD2d 390). Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

In re Ramunno, 202 A.D.2d 511, 609 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 511 (In re Ramunno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related