In re Ramon S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ramon S.

99 A.D.3d 430, 951 N.Y.2d 393

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 2012·Published

Opinion

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The evidence credited by the court established that, in the incident specified in the petition, appellant, while acting in concert with another person, attempted to cause physical injury to the victim. We have considered and rejected appellant’s challenges to the [431]*431court’s finding. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The evidence credited by the court established that, in the incident specified in the petition, appellant, while acting in concert with another person, attempted to cause physical injury to the victim. We have considered and rejected appellant’s challenges to the [431]*431court’s finding. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

In re Ramon S., 99 A.D.3d 430, 951 N.Y.2d 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

99 A.D.3d 430 (In re Ramon S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related