In re Ramon S.

99 A.D.3d 430, 951 N.Y.2d 393

This text of 99 A.D.3d 430 (In re Ramon S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ramon S., 99 A.D.3d 430, 951 N.Y.2d 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The evidence credited by the court established that, in the incident specified in the petition, appellant, while acting in concert with another person, attempted to cause physical injury to the victim. We have considered and rejected appellant’s challenges to the [431]*431court’s finding. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 430, 951 N.Y.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ramon-s-nyappdiv-2012.