In re Ramon P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ramon P.

295 A.D.2d 233, 743 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 233 (In re Ramon P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ramon P., 295 A.D.2d 233, 743 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about June 10, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for a period of up to one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s allocution of appellant and his mother, taken together with the statements of appellant’s counsel, clearly established that both appellant and his mother understood all of the rights that appellant would be waiving through his admission. Accordingly, the allocution complied with Family Court Act § 321.3 (1) and confirmed that appellant’s admission was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made (see, Matter of Charles M., 143 AD2d 96). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Lerner, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about June 10, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed an act, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for a period of up to one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s allocution of appellant and his mother, taken together with the statements of appellant’s counsel, clearly established that both appellant and his mother understood all of the rights that appellant would be waiving through his admission. Accordingly, the allocution complied with Family Court Act § 321.3 (1) and confirmed that appellant’s admission was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made (see, Matter of Charles M., 143 AD2d 96). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Lerner, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 233, 743 N.Y.S.2d 717, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ramon-p-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack