In Re Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Ramirez

191 S.W.3d 903, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4259, 2006 WL 1331166

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 9, 2006

Docket14-06-00321-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.W.3d 903 (In Re Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Ramirez, 191 S.W.3d 903, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4259, 2006 WL 1331166 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On April 12, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex.R.App. P. 52.1. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Michael Fields, presiding judge of County Court at Law Number Fourteen, to execute and file a certification of relator’s right to appeal the denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus. He also asks this Court to compel the Harris County District Clerk to forward relator’s notice of appeal to this Court.

With respect to the Harris County District Clerk, we lack jurisdiction to address relator’s complaint. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon 2004).

With respect to the remainder of the petition, on April 24, 2006, the trial court sent a copy of its certification of relator’s right to appeal to this Court. Therefore, that portion of relator’s claim is moot.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On April 12, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex.R.App. P. 52.1. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Michael Fields, presiding judge of County Court at Law Number Fourteen, to execute and file a certification of relator’s right to appeal the denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus. He also asks this Court to compel the Harris County District Clerk to forward relator’s notice of appeal to this Court.

With respect to the Harris County District Clerk, we lack jurisdiction to address relator’s complaint. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon 2004).

With respect to the remainder of the petition, on April 24, 2006, the trial court sent a copy of its certification of relator’s right to appeal to this Court. Therefore, that portion of relator’s claim is moot.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.W.3d 903, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 4259, 2006 WL 1331166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ramirez-texapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack