In re Ramirez

251 F. App'x 847
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. No. 07-7002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lazaro Alvardo Ramirez, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion to vacate, as it had neither summarily dismissed the motion nor ordered the Government to file a response. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has now ordered the Government to respond to the motion. Accordingly, because the district court has now taken significant action in Ramirez’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant Ramirez’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ramirez, 251 F. App'x 847 (4th Cir. 2007).

251 F. App'x 847 (In re Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related