In re Rama Group of Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rama Group of Co.

197 A.D.2d 806, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10109

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 806 (In re Rama Group of Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rama Group of Co., 197 A.D.2d 806, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10109 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 22, 1992 which assessed Rama Group of Companies, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

Rama Group of Companies, Inc. is in the business of delivering monthly periodicals to subscribers in Erie and Niagara Counties. The Board found that the delivery persons used by Rama Group were employees and not independent contractors. The evidence in the record provides sufficient indicia of control to support the Board’s conclusion of an employment relationship.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 22, 1992 which assessed Rama Group of Companies, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

Rama Group of Companies, Inc. is in the business of delivering monthly periodicals to subscribers in Erie and Niagara Counties. The Board found that the delivery persons used by Rama Group were employees and not independent contractors. The evidence in the record provides sufficient indicia of control to support the Board’s conclusion of an employment relationship.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 806, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rama-group-of-co-nyappdiv-1993.