In re Raiford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Raiford

792 A.2d 1247, 568 Pa. 100

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 31, 2002

DocketNo. 42 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 792 A.2d 1247 (In re Raiford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Raiford, 792 A.2d 1247, 568 Pa. 100 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 7, 2001, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 7, 2001, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

792 A.2d 1247, 568 Pa. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raiford-pa-2002.