Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Raheem L.

In re Raheem L.

2011 Ohio 955, 128 Ohio St. 3d 355
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 2011
Docket2010-2030
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 Ohio 955 (In re Raheem L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Raheem L., 2011 Ohio 955, 128 Ohio St. 3d 355 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Anderson, 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 2001-Ohio-131, 748 N.E.2d 67, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Anderson
748 N.E.2d 67 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
In re Anderson
2001 Ohio 131 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 Ohio 955, 128 Ohio St. 3d 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-raheem-l-ohio-2011.