In Re RAGHUBIR

Opinion

Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2020

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

______________________

In re: VINODH RAGHUBIR,

Petitioner

______________________

2020-128

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00388-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Vinodh Raghubir currently has a case pending before the United States Court of Federal Claims. He now petitions for a writ of prohibition, asking this court to “prohibit conduct pursuant to ‘the conspiracy to predetermine the outcome of judicial proceedings’ throughout proceedings now involving the Federal Court of Claims.”

Like a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that is available only when a petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to relief and no adequate alternative legal channels through which to obtain that relief . See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of

Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2020

2 IN RE: RAGHUBIR

Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004); In re Missouri, 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). Mr. Raghubir has not demonstrated that an appeal from an eventual final judgment of the Court of Federal Claims would be inadequate or that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition is denied.

FOR THE COURT

June 18, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

s24