In Re RAGHUBIR

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: June 18, 2020
• Docket: 20-128
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2020

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: VINODH RAGHUBIR, Petitioner ______________________

2020-128 ______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00388-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. ______________________

ON PETITION ______________________

PER CURIAM. ORDER Vinodh Raghubir currently has a case pending before the United States Court of Federal Claims. He now peti- tions for a writ of prohibition, asking this court to “prohibit conduct pursuant to ‘the conspiracy to predetermine the outcome of judicial proceedings’ throughout proceedings now involving the Federal Court of Claims.” Like a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that is available only when a petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to relief and no adequate al- ternative legal channels through which to obtain that re- lief. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2020

2 IN RE: RAGHUBIR

Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004); In re Missouri, 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). Mr. Raghubir has not demonstrated that an appeal from an eventual final judg- ment of the Court of Federal Claims would be inadequate or that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition is denied. FOR THE COURT

June 18, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

s24