In re Rafuse
This text of 274 A.D. 944 (In re Rafuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order denying application to vacate a written demand for a statement of receipts and disbursements, etc., served by a carpentry contractor upon the owner of an improvement to real property under subdivisions (4) and (5) of section 36-d of the Lien Law. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. There appears to be no authority for the making of a motion to vacate the demand, such as the one here made, particularly since no action or proceeding is at present pending. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 944, 83 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rafuse-nyappdiv-1948.