In Re Rafael Razo v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Rafael Razo v. the State of Texas (In Re Rafael Razo v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 16, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00841-CV
IN RE RAFAEL RAZO, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 434th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-273281
MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 7, 2023, relator Rafael Razo filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable J. Christian Becerra and Argie Brame, respectively the presiding and associate judges of the 434th District Court, to vacate an order retaining the trial court proceeding on the trial court’s docket.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Rafael Razo v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rafael-razo-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.