1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2
4 IN RE: CASE NO. 14-04508 5 6 RAFAEL ERNESTO CRUZ SONERA Chapter 13
7 8 Debtor(s) 9 10 FILED & ENTERED ON 03/08/2016 11
13 OPINION & ORDER 14 This matter comes before the court on Creditor Judith Aviles Romero’s Motion for Summary 15 16 Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support seeking a determination of non-dischargeability of a 17 debt assumed by the Debtor pursuant to their divorce decree. [Dkt. No. 69]. In his Memorandum of 18 Law in Support of Summary Judgment, the Debtor cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing that 19 20 such debt is dischargeable upon completion of his chapter 13 plan. [Dkt. No. 73]. Accordingly, the 21 threshold issue is whether the obligation assumed by the Debtor is a property settlement debt under 22 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15). The following shall constitute the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of 23 24 law in accordance with FED. R. BANKR. P. 7052. 25
1 1 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2 This court has jurisdiction over this contested matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) as a 3 core proceeding arising under Title 11. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Such proceeding has been 4 5 referred to this court by the District Court under its Order of Reference. See 11 U.S.C. § 157(a); 6 L.Cv.R. 83K(a). Venue is proper in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1408. 7 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 8
9 Mrs. Judith Aviles Romero (hereinafter “the Creditor”) and Mr. Rafael Ernesto Cruz Sonera 10 (hereinafter “the Debtor”) were granted a divorce in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance on 11 October 25, 2011. See Dkt. No. 69 at 1-2. They had two children during the marriage. Id. There are 12 13 no other dependents to provide for other than the parties themselves and their children. 14 The divorce decree incorporated numerous stipulations related to custody, child support, and 15 division of property. See Dkt. No. 73 at 1. In particular, the Debtor assumed and agreed to pay off the 16 17 parties’ credit card debt from Banco Popular—the same debt that Creditor asks this court to find 18 non-dischargeable as a non-support divorce-related debt. See Dkt. No. 69 at 4. 19 The Debtor filed a chapter 13 petition on May 30, 2014. See Dkt. No. 1. He scheduled the 20 21 credit card debt as an unsecured debt and listed the Creditor as a co-debtor on Schedule H. See Dkt. 22 No. 33 at 1. The Debtor’s chapter 13 plan was confirmed on November 4, 2014. See Dkt. No. 43. 23 According to the Creditor, she received a letter from Banco Popular holding her liable for the 24 25 credit card debt assumed by her ex-husband. See Dkt. No. 69 at 2. She then filed a priority claim
2 1 despite the fact that Banco Popular had already filed an unsecured claim for the amount owed on the 2 credit card debt. See Dkt. No. 73 at 2. In her reply to the Debtor’s objection, the Creditor recognized 3 that “her real intention…was to seek a court determination of no[n]-dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. 4 5 § 523(a)(15).” See Dkt. No. 56 at 1. 6 SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD 7 Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56, made applicable to this proceeding by FED. R. BANKR. P. 8 9 7056, summary judgment is proper only where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and 10 the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In reviewing a motion for summary 11 judgment, all inferences “must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the 12 13 motion.” See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-88 (1986). The 14 party moving for summary judgment always bears the initial responsibility of informing the court of 15 the basis for its motion, “and identifying those portions of ‘the pleadings, depositions, answers to 16 17 interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits if any’ which it believes 18 demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 19 323 (1986). Where the moving party has met its initial burden, the adverse party “may not rest upon 20 21 the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings but…must set forth specific facts showing that there 22 is a genuine issue for trial.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). A genuine 23 issue for trial exists if the evidence is such that a reasonable fact-finder could find in favor of the 24 25 nonmoving party. See id.
3 1 In cases such as this, where the parties have both moved for summary judgment, the court 2 must consider each motion separately on its merits, since each party, as a movant for summary 3 judgment, bears the burden of establishing both the nonexistence of genuine issues of material fact 4 5 and that party’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. See In re Markowitz, 190 F.3d 455, 463 6 n.6 (6th Cir. 1999). The fact that both parties simultaneously argue that there are no genuine factual 7 issues does not in itself establish that a trial is unnecessary, and the fact that one party has failed to 8 9 sustain its burden under FED. R. CIV. P. 56 does not automatically entitle the opposing party to 10 summary judgment. See Wright, Miller & Kane, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: CIVIL 3d § 11 2720 (1998). 12 13 LEGAL ANALYSIS 14 In her motion, the Creditor seeks a judgment pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) as to the 15 non-dischargeability of a credit card debt assumed by the Debtor in the course of their divorce. See 16 17 Dkt. No. 69 at 4. This section of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part, as follows: 18 A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does 19 not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— . . . . . 20 (15) to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor and not of the kind 21 described in paragraph (5) that is incurred by the debtor in the course of a divorce or separation or in connection with a separation agreement, divorce 22 decree or other order of a court of record, or a determination made in 23 accordance with State or territorial law by a governmental unit[.]
24 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15). 25
4 1 Notably, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) only governs discharges in a chapter 13 case pursuant to 11 2 U.S.C. § 1328(b). That subsection provides for what is commonly known as a hardship discharge 3 when the debtor has not completed payments under his chapter 13 plan. However, 11 U.S.C. § 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2
4 IN RE: CASE NO. 14-04508 5 6 RAFAEL ERNESTO CRUZ SONERA Chapter 13
7 8 Debtor(s) 9 10 FILED & ENTERED ON 03/08/2016 11
13 OPINION & ORDER 14 This matter comes before the court on Creditor Judith Aviles Romero’s Motion for Summary 15 16 Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support seeking a determination of non-dischargeability of a 17 debt assumed by the Debtor pursuant to their divorce decree. [Dkt. No. 69]. In his Memorandum of 18 Law in Support of Summary Judgment, the Debtor cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing that 19 20 such debt is dischargeable upon completion of his chapter 13 plan. [Dkt. No. 73]. Accordingly, the 21 threshold issue is whether the obligation assumed by the Debtor is a property settlement debt under 22 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15). The following shall constitute the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of 23 24 law in accordance with FED. R. BANKR. P. 7052. 25
1 1 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2 This court has jurisdiction over this contested matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) as a 3 core proceeding arising under Title 11. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Such proceeding has been 4 5 referred to this court by the District Court under its Order of Reference. See 11 U.S.C. § 157(a); 6 L.Cv.R. 83K(a). Venue is proper in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1408. 7 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 8
9 Mrs. Judith Aviles Romero (hereinafter “the Creditor”) and Mr. Rafael Ernesto Cruz Sonera 10 (hereinafter “the Debtor”) were granted a divorce in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance on 11 October 25, 2011. See Dkt. No. 69 at 1-2. They had two children during the marriage. Id. There are 12 13 no other dependents to provide for other than the parties themselves and their children. 14 The divorce decree incorporated numerous stipulations related to custody, child support, and 15 division of property. See Dkt. No. 73 at 1. In particular, the Debtor assumed and agreed to pay off the 16 17 parties’ credit card debt from Banco Popular—the same debt that Creditor asks this court to find 18 non-dischargeable as a non-support divorce-related debt. See Dkt. No. 69 at 4. 19 The Debtor filed a chapter 13 petition on May 30, 2014. See Dkt. No. 1. He scheduled the 20 21 credit card debt as an unsecured debt and listed the Creditor as a co-debtor on Schedule H. See Dkt. 22 No. 33 at 1. The Debtor’s chapter 13 plan was confirmed on November 4, 2014. See Dkt. No. 43. 23 According to the Creditor, she received a letter from Banco Popular holding her liable for the 24 25 credit card debt assumed by her ex-husband. See Dkt. No. 69 at 2. She then filed a priority claim
2 1 despite the fact that Banco Popular had already filed an unsecured claim for the amount owed on the 2 credit card debt. See Dkt. No. 73 at 2. In her reply to the Debtor’s objection, the Creditor recognized 3 that “her real intention…was to seek a court determination of no[n]-dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. 4 5 § 523(a)(15).” See Dkt. No. 56 at 1. 6 SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD 7 Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56, made applicable to this proceeding by FED. R. BANKR. P. 8 9 7056, summary judgment is proper only where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and 10 the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In reviewing a motion for summary 11 judgment, all inferences “must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the 12 13 motion.” See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-88 (1986). The 14 party moving for summary judgment always bears the initial responsibility of informing the court of 15 the basis for its motion, “and identifying those portions of ‘the pleadings, depositions, answers to 16 17 interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits if any’ which it believes 18 demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 19 323 (1986). Where the moving party has met its initial burden, the adverse party “may not rest upon 20 21 the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings but…must set forth specific facts showing that there 22 is a genuine issue for trial.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). A genuine 23 issue for trial exists if the evidence is such that a reasonable fact-finder could find in favor of the 24 25 nonmoving party. See id.
3 1 In cases such as this, where the parties have both moved for summary judgment, the court 2 must consider each motion separately on its merits, since each party, as a movant for summary 3 judgment, bears the burden of establishing both the nonexistence of genuine issues of material fact 4 5 and that party’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. See In re Markowitz, 190 F.3d 455, 463 6 n.6 (6th Cir. 1999). The fact that both parties simultaneously argue that there are no genuine factual 7 issues does not in itself establish that a trial is unnecessary, and the fact that one party has failed to 8 9 sustain its burden under FED. R. CIV. P. 56 does not automatically entitle the opposing party to 10 summary judgment. See Wright, Miller & Kane, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: CIVIL 3d § 11 2720 (1998). 12 13 LEGAL ANALYSIS 14 In her motion, the Creditor seeks a judgment pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) as to the 15 non-dischargeability of a credit card debt assumed by the Debtor in the course of their divorce. See 16 17 Dkt. No. 69 at 4. This section of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part, as follows: 18 A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), 1228(b), or 1328(b) of this title does 19 not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— . . . . . 20 (15) to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor and not of the kind 21 described in paragraph (5) that is incurred by the debtor in the course of a divorce or separation or in connection with a separation agreement, divorce 22 decree or other order of a court of record, or a determination made in 23 accordance with State or territorial law by a governmental unit[.]
24 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15). 25
4 1 Notably, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) only governs discharges in a chapter 13 case pursuant to 11 2 U.S.C. § 1328(b). That subsection provides for what is commonly known as a hardship discharge 3 when the debtor has not completed payments under his chapter 13 plan. However, 11 U.S.C. § 4 5 1328(a) governs dischargeability of debts in a chapter 13 case when the debtor completes all 6 payments under the plan and certifies that all amounts payable that are due under a domestic support 7 obligation have been paid. See 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a) (providing that when such circumstances are 8 9 satisfied “the court shall grant the debtor a discharge of all debts provided for by the plan…except 10 any debt…of the kind specified in…paragraph (1)(B), (1)(C), (2), (3), (4), (5), (8), or (9) of section 11 523(a).”) Therefore, certain debts to a spouse, former spouse, or child of a debtor that are not 12 13 domestic support obligations, see § 523(a)(5), are among those dischargeable debts that fall within 14 the scope of 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a). 15 The reason why 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) does not apply to chapter 13 is because the discharge 16 17 provision found in 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a)(2) does not include 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) among the 18 enumerated exceptions to the chapter 13 discharge. See 4 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY ¶ 523.23 at 523- 19 127 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer, eds., 16th ed. 2014). Overwhelming case law supports 20 21 this court’s reading of this statutory provision. See, e.g., In re Pylant, 467 B.R. 246, 251 (Bankr. 22 M.D. Ga. 2012) (“Obligations incurred by the Chapter 13 debtor in connection with a divorce which 23 are not domestic support obligations under 11 U.S.C. § 101(14A) are covered by 11 U.S.C. § 24 25 523(a)(15). Those types of obligations are generally referred to as being in the nature of property
5 1 division and are dischargeable.”); In re Shultz, 2012 WL 5879129 at *2 (Bankr. D. Neb. Nov. 21, 2 2012) (in Chapter 13 context, a debt that “is part of the parties’ property settlement…is dischargeable 3 if the debtor completes the payments under the terms of her confirmed plan.”); In re Hutchens, 480 4 5 B.R. 374, 385-86 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012) (“…the law is now well-settled that a claim for a property 6 settlement arising from divorce proceedings can still be discharged in a Chapter 13 case if a debtor 7 makes all the required payments under a plan and receives a full compliance discharge under § 8 9 1328(a).”); In re Sprouse, 2008 WL 544999 (Bankr. D. Neb. Feb. 25, 2008) at *1 (“[i]n contrast to 10 the non-dischargeability of a domestic support obligation, a debt to a former spouse that is not in the 11 nature of support, described in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15), which would be non-dischargeable in a 12 13 Chapter 7 case, is dischargeable in a Chapter 13 case.”) 14 At the heart of Creditor’s argument of non-dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) is 15 the requirement that the Debtor must be obliged to the Creditor under the terms of the requisite 16 17 agreement or order. “Section 523(a)(15) makes nondischargeable only “debt[s]…to a spouse, former 18 spouse, or child of the debtor.” In re Stanley, 2013 WL 1336103 (Bankr. N.D. Al. March 29, 2013). 19 In the present case, the divorce decree issued by the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance takes account 20 21 of the parties’ stipulation that the Debtor assumed and agreed to pay their marital credit card debt to 22 Banco Popular—a third party creditor. Accordingly, the debt in question falls outside the scope of 11 23 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15) and is therefore dischargeable upon completion of the chapter 13 plan. 24 25 Furthermore, the Debtor claims that the divorce decree does not include an indemnity
provision under which the Creditor may be held liable for the debt. Because the First Circuit has not
6 1 ruled on the issue, it is worth noting the split of authority as to whether debts delegated to divorcing 2 spouses in decrees without indemnity provisions are excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 3 523(a)(15). Some courts have held that an express indemnity clause must be present to create 4 5 liability from the debtor to the former spouse. See, e.g., In re Stegall, 188 B.R. 597, 598 (Bankr. 6 W.D. Mo. 1995) (holding section 523(a)(15) inapplicable because no indemnity provision was 7 present in decree or property settlement agreement); In re LaRue, 204 B.R. 531, 534 (Bankr.E.D. 8 9 Tenn.1997) (same); In re McKinnis, 287 B.R. 245, 257 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2002) (same). Other courts 10 have held that divorce decrees create an obligation on the part of the debtor to the non-debtor spouse 11 even in the absence of an indemnity clause. See, e.g., In re Gibson, 219 B.R. 195, 205 (6th Cir. BAP 12 13 1998) (express provision not required); In re Osborne, 262 B.R. 435, 442 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2001) 14 (same); In re Woszczyna, 295 B.R. 425, 429 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2003) (same); In re Montgomery, 310 15 B.R. 169, 180 (Bankr.C.D. Cal. 2004) (same). 16 17 At this juncture, this court need not delve into this unresolved issue. Assuming, for the sake 18 of argument, that the credit card debt assumed by the Debtor falls under the scope of 11 U.S.C. § 19 523(a)(15), it would still be dischargeable in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a). Therefore, in the 20 21 event that the Debtor’s chapter 13 plan is successfully completed, his discharge will include any 22 unpaid balance owed on the credit card obligation with Banco Popular. 23
24 25
7 1 CONCLUSION 2 For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby DENIES the Creditor’s Motion for Summar 3 4 || Judgment and GRANTS the Debtor’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ordered thai > || the Creditor’s proof of claim be DISALLOWED in its entirety. 6 SO ORDERED 7 8 San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 8th day of March, 2016. 9 = 11 Brian K. Tester 12 U.S. Bankruptcy Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25