In Re Rader

Second Circuit

In Re Rader

194 F.2d 988, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3710

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1952

Docket163, Docket 22232

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 194 F.2d 988 (In Re Rader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Rader, 194 F.2d 988, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3710 (2d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The referee found that on February 28, 1950, the appellant sold a cash register to-the bankrupt on a conditional sales contract, a copy of which it did not file for record. The bankrupt did nothing to conceal his financial condition from the appellant nor did he make any statement,, oral or written, to induce the appellant, who was aware of the condition of his business, to extend credit to him. He acted in good faith and did nothing to defraud or mislead the appellant who relied solely upon its conditional sales contraed

On March 21, 1950, a voluntary petition in bankruptcy was filed and thereafter the purchaser was adjudicated a bankrupt and. the appellee is his duly qualified trustee.

This bankrupt was in a shaky financial condition when he made the purchase, but he had recently put $6,000 of his own money into his business and the evidence as a whole warranted the findings to the effect that he had reason to, and did, believe he could meet the payments on the conditional -bill of sale as they fell due.

That distinguishes such cases as. California Conserving Co. v. D’Avanzo, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 528 and leáves the seller with no legal basis for rescission. And, of course, the appellant’s failure to file the conditional sales contract or to prove actual notice to all creditors leaves the trustee in bankruptcy free to avoid it. Matter of Master Knitting Corp., 2 Cir.,' 7 F.2d .11.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The referee found that on February 28, 1950, the appellant sold a cash register to-the bankrupt on a conditional sales contract, a copy of which it did not file for record. The bankrupt did nothing to conceal his financial condition from the appellant nor did he make any statement,, oral or written, to induce the appellant, who was aware of the condition of his business, to extend credit to him. He acted in good faith and did nothing to defraud or mislead the appellant who relied solely upon its conditional sales contraed

On March 21, 1950, a voluntary petition in bankruptcy was filed and thereafter the purchaser was adjudicated a bankrupt and. the appellee is his duly qualified trustee.

This bankrupt was in a shaky financial condition when he made the purchase, but he had recently put $6,000 of his own money into his business and the evidence as a whole warranted the findings to the effect that he had reason to, and did, believe he could meet the payments on the conditional -bill of sale as they fell due.

That distinguishes such cases as. California Conserving Co. v. D’Avanzo, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 528 and leáves the seller with no legal basis for rescission. And, of course, the appellant’s failure to file the conditional sales contract or to prove actual notice to all creditors leaves the trustee in bankruptcy free to avoid it. Matter of Master Knitting Corp., 2 Cir.,' 7 F.2d .11.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 F.2d 988, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rader-ca2-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack