In re Radbill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Radbill

856 A.2d 41, 579 Pa. 402, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1945

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 29, 2004

DocketNo. 932 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 856 A.2d 41 (In re Radbill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Radbill, 856 A.2d 41, 579 Pa. 402, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1945 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 28, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael Radbill to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that Michael Radbill is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2004, a Rule having been entered by this Court on May 28, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael Radbill to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that Michael Radbill is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

856 A.2d 41, 579 Pa. 402, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-radbill-pa-2004.