In Re Rachel
912 A.2d 476, 280 Conn. 941
This text of 912 A.2d 476 (In Re Rachel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Rachel, 912 A.2d 476, 280 Conn. 941 (Colo. 2006).
Opinion
In re RACHEL J. et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Raymond J. Rigat, in support of the petition.
Paula D. Sullivan, assistant attorney general, and Raymond F. Parlato, Danielson, in opposition.
The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn.App. 748, 905 A.2d 1271 (2006), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Rachel J.
905 A.2d 1271 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
912 A.2d 476, 280 Conn. 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rachel-conn-2006.