In re Rabkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Rabkin

107 A.D.2d 776, 485 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.2d 776 (In re Rabkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Rabkin, 107 A.D.2d 776, 485 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Application by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, to punish Michael F. Rabkin, D.D.S., based on this court’s order dated September 28,1984 based upon his contempt of a subpoena duces tecum so ordered by this court dated July 13, 1984 which found him to be in contempt in his failure to comply or to come forward to offer any explanation for his noncompliance.

The matter is referred to Martin Siegelbaum, Esq., 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11242 as Special Referee to hear and to report on the appropriate measure of punishment to be imposed.

[777]*777The application will be held in abeyance pending the Special Referee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Application by the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, to punish Michael F. Rabkin, D.D.S., based on this court’s order dated September 28,1984 based upon his contempt of a subpoena duces tecum so ordered by this court dated July 13, 1984 which found him to be in contempt in his failure to comply or to come forward to offer any explanation for his noncompliance.

The matter is referred to Martin Siegelbaum, Esq., 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11242 as Special Referee to hear and to report on the appropriate measure of punishment to be imposed.

[777]*777The application will be held in abeyance pending the Special Referee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.2d 776, 485 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-rabkin-nyappdiv-1985.