In re R.A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re R.A.

723 A.2d 156

DecidedDecember 7, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 723 A.2d 156 (In re R.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re R.A., 723 A.2d 156 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the trial court erred by refusing to suppress the physical evidence seized from Petitioner’s person because it found that the seizure met the requirements of the plain feel exception to the warrant requirement.

This matter is to be consolidated for argument with Commonwealth v. Stevenson, — Pa.-, 723 A.2d 156.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the trial court erred by refusing to suppress the physical evidence seized from Petitioner’s person because it found that the seizure met the requirements of the plain feel exception to the warrant requirement.

This matter is to be consolidated for argument with Commonwealth v. Stevenson, — Pa.-, 723 A.2d 156.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 A.2d 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ra-pa-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack