in Re R. Wayne Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 16, 2009·No. 03-09-00683-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-09-00683-CV

In re R. Wayne Johnson



ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



Relator R. Wayne Johnson seeks to compel the trial court to rule on his motion to disqualify opposing counsel. Johnson has not provided us with a record to establish that he ever presented such a motion to the trial court. A trial court has a ministerial duty to consider and rule on motions properly filed and pending before it within a reasonable time. See In re Layton, 257 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 2008, no pet.). However, in order to obtain mandamus relief compelling the trial court to act on a motion, a relator must show that a motion was actually presented to the trial court's attention or presented for a ruling. See id.; Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st. Dist.] 1992, no pet.). Because Johnson has not provided a record supporting his claim to mandamus relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Filed: December 16, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re R. Wayne Johnson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

in Re R. Wayne Johnson (in Re R. Wayne Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Layton
257 S.W.3d 794 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)