in Re: R. Thomas Williams
This text of in Re: R. Thomas Williams (in Re: R. Thomas Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-07-00059-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: R. THOMAS WILLIAMS, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator R. Thomas Williams filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the respondent, the Honorable James A. Williamson, Justice of the Peace, Precinct #3, Houston County, Texas. Williams requests that we order Respondent to give his small claims petition a docket number and place the case on the court’s docket.
A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Easton v. Franks, 842 S.W.2d 772, 773 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Williams does not argue that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
BRIAN HOYLE
Justice
Opinion delivered February 9, 2007.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: R. Thomas Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-r-thomas-williams-texapp-2007.