in Re: R. Scott Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 4, 2008
Docket13-08-00574-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: R. Scott Brown (in Re: R. Scott Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: R. Scott Brown, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00574-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN RE R. SCOTT BROWN, BLACK ROCK INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP, MARK G. MAGNESS, ALAN L. SMITH, J&K EQUITY PARTNERS, LP, RICHARD L. BURLESON, RICHARD A. DEGNER, CRAIG LINDBERG, RANDOLPH NEWCOMER, JR., DIVERSE EXPLORATION, LP, DARIN GOSDA, MARGARET S. GOSDA, ORPHEUS HOLDINGS, LLC, ASLAN CAPITAL FUND I (QP) LP, AND PORT ISABEL LOGISTICAL OFFSHORE TERMINAL, INC. ____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, R. Scott Brown, et al., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

cause on October 7, 2008. The Court ordered the real parties in interest, Robert A. Ostos,

David Eymard, and Russell L. Reichert, to file a response to relators’ petition for writ of

mandamus before the expiration of ten days from the date of the order. See TEX . R. APP.

1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2.8 (d ) (“W hen d enying relief, the court m ay h and d ow n a n o pinion b ut is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). P. 52.8(b). Such response was duly filed.

Relators have now informed the Court that the parties have compromised and

settled their differences. Accordingly, this original proceeding is DISMISSED without

reference to the merits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 4th day of November, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: R. Scott Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-r-scott-brown-texapp-2008.