In re R. R. R.

525 S.E.2d 364, 271 Ga. 888, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 263, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 8
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 18, 2000
DocketS00A0710
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 525 S.E.2d 364 (In re R. R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re R. R. R., 525 S.E.2d 364, 271 Ga. 888, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 263, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 8 (Ga. 2000).

Opinion

Per curiam.

R. R. R. appeals the Board of Bar Examiners’ decision to deny his request for a waiver of the educational requirements for admission to the State Bar of Georgia, in order that R. R. R. be able to sit for the Bar Examination. R. R. R. is a graduate of Monticello University Law [889]*889School, a school not approved by either the American Bar Association or by the Board of Bar Examiners. R. R. R. completed his degree at home and without attending classes. The Board refused to waive the requirement that an applicant must have received an initial law degree from a law school approved by the American Bar Association or by the Board of Bar Examiners.1 We find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in refusing the waiver, and we affirm.

Decided January 18, 2000. Bar applicant, pro se.

This Court has the power and the duty to set the educational requirements for admission to the practice of law in this State, and therefore, “admission to the State Bar is governed by the Rules promulgated by this Court, which place the burden on the applicant to establish the fitness to practice law.” In re G. E. C., 269 Ga. 744, 745 (1) (506 SE2d 843) (1998). See also In re Terese S. Oliver, 261 Ga. 850 (413 SE2d 435) (1992). R. R. R. contends that he is fit to practice law because his legal educational experience and knowledge gained match that of one graduating from a law school approved by the American Bar Association. However, his submitted assertions regarding curriculum, examination and writing samples, and statements from his wife and friends about the amount of time R. R. R. spent in home study, in no manner demonstrate the quality of his educational experience or the competence gained in the law, if any.

In order to promote the State’s significant interest in assuring that members of the legal profession are competent, prerequisite for admission to the State Bar is graduation from an approved law school. In re Terese S. Oliver, supra at 852 (3). R. R. R. has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that such requirement should be waived on his behalf. Id. at 852 (4); In re G E. C., supra at 745 (3). Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners stands.

Denial of waiver affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Rebecca S. Mick, Assistant Attorney General, for Board of Bar Examiners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Domantay
684 S.E.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 S.E.2d 364, 271 Ga. 888, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 263, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-r-r-r-ga-2000.