In Re R & R Investors

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 21, 2010·No. 2010-M947·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Mutteb -t,tate5 Court of Zippeat5 for tbe jfeberat circuit

IN RE R&R INVESTORS (UPA PARTNERSHIP), CURTIS HOGENSON, DIANE LARSON, EILEEN M. BERGER, and SHIRLEY J. ARVIDSON, PARTNERS, Petitioners.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 947

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 03-CV-2264, Judge Susan G. Braden.

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

ORDER R&R Investors et al. (R&R) submit a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Federal Claims to (1) vacate a stipulation of voluntary dismissal, (2) grant R&R's motion to vacate and for recon- sideration, (3) rule on R&R's motion to substitute counsel, rule on R&R's motion for leave to intervene, and file R&R's notice of appeal. Upon consideration thereof, IN RE R&R INVESTORS 2

IT Is ORDERED THAT: The United States and A.F.T.E.R. Incorporated et al. are directed to respond to R&R's mandamus petition within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly jitt 2 1 2010 Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

FI LED cc: Erick G. Kaardal, Esq. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE F EDERAL CIRCUIT Jeff H. Eckland, Esq. Judge, Fed. Cl. JUL 2 1 2010 Clerk, Fed. Cl. s17 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re R & R Investors, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

In Re R & R Investors (In Re R & R Investors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.