in Re: Quy Dao
This text of in Re: Quy Dao (in Re: Quy Dao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed July 1, 2022
In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00437-CV
IN RE QUY DAO, Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2 Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 107122-CC2
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle Relator’s May 9, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial
court’s temporary orders regarding Mother’s Day possession in the underlying suit
affecting the parent-child relationship. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires
relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an
adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021)
(orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex.
2004) (orig. proceeding)).
Based on our review of the petition and the record, we conclude that relator
has failed to show a clear abuse of discretion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
220437f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Quy Dao, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-quy-dao-texapp-2022.