In re Quinones

901 A.2d 979
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 15, 2006
DocketNo. 1111 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 979 (In re Quinones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Quinones, 901 A.2d 979 (Pa. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2006, Jose Matos Quinones having been suspended for a period of ninety days from the practice of law before the Board of Immigration Appeals, the Immigration Courts and the Department of Homeland Security by Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dated September 16, 2005; the said Jose Matos Quinones having been directed on March 3, 2006, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable disci[980]*980pline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Jose Matos Quinones is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of ninety days, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
901 A.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-quinones-pa-2006.