in Re: Quincy Blakely
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed December 7, 2018.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01475-CV
IN RE QUINCY BLAKELY, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-18020
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Before the Court is relator’s December 7, 2018 petition for writ of mandamus and
prohibition. To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that
the trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex
rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record
before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly,
we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the
court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
181475F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Quincy Blakely (in Re: Quincy Blakely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.