in Re: Quincy Blakely

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 7, 2018·No. 05-18-01475-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed December 7, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01475-CV

IN RE QUINCY BLAKELY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-18020

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Before the Court is relator’s December 7, 2018 petition for writ of mandamus and

prohibition. To establish a right to mandamus relief in a criminal case, the relator must show that

the trial court violated a ministerial duty and there is no adequate remedy at law. In re State ex

rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record

before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly,

we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the

court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

181475F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Quincy Blakely, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

in Re: Quincy Blakely (in Re: Quincy Blakely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re STATE of Texas Ex Rel. David P. WEEKS
391 S.W.3d 117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)