in Re: Quillon Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 30, 2005
Docket12-05-00196-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Quillon Brown (in Re: Quillon Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Quillon Brown, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                                                                                    NO. 12-05-00196-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT


TYLER, TEXAS

§


IN RE: QUILLON BROWN                               §    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Relator Quillon Brown, proceeding pro se and informa pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus against Janice Staples, in her capacity as District Clerk of Anderson County, Texas. Specifically, Brown requests that Staples be compelled to file his original petition for photostatic copies of all documents and trial records, to provide him with the cause number assigned to his original petition, and to place the petition on the court’s docket for judicial review.

            A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004-05). In order for a district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See id. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Relator has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the respondent is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we deny the writ of mandamus.

                                                                                                    SAM GRIFFITH

                                                                                                               Justice

Opinion delivered June 30, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.


(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Quillon Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-quillon-brown-texapp-2005.