In Re Quentin Goffney v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 26, 2024·No. 03-24-00611-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00611-CV

In re Quentin Goffney

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Quentin Goffney has filed a motion for suspension of the rules that, based

on the relief requested, we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Surgitek,

Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (explaining courts look to

substance of pleading rather than its caption or form to determine its nature). The petition for

writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Filed: September 26, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Quentin Goffney v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re Quentin Goffney v. the State of Texas (In Re Quentin Goffney v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel
997 S.W.2d 598 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)