In re Quackenboss
20 F. Cas. 104, 1842 U.S. App. LEXIS 577
Opinion
(charging jury). (1) That if, in contemplation of the passage of a bankrupt law, the bankrupt preferred any of his creditors by payments previous to the 1st of January, 1841, then he was barred from obtaining his certificate. (2) That by the mere fact of preference after the 1st January, 1841, he was in like manner barred of his certificate, whether he contemplated the passage of a bankrupt law or uot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Quackenboss, 20 F. Cas. 104, 1842 U.S. App. LEXIS 577 (circtsdny 1842).
20 F. Cas. 104 (In re Quackenboss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.