In re Putsey

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Putsey

693 N.E.2d 565, 1998 Ind. LEXIS 44, 1998 WL 208787

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1998·No. No. 66S00-9305-DI-511·Published

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission recommends that the petitioner, Albert E. Putsey, be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent has met the requirements of reinstatement to the bar of this state as set forth in Ind. Admission and [566] Discipline Rule 23. Accordingly, we find that the Commission’s recommendation should be adopted and that, accordingly, the respondent should be reinstated to the bar of this state.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Petition for Reinstatement of Albert E. Putsey is hereby granted. Accordingly, he is reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission recommends that the petitioner, Albert E. Putsey, be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent has met the requirements of reinstatement to the bar of this state as set forth in Ind. Admission and [566] Discipline Rule 23. Accordingly, we find that the Commission’s recommendation should be adopted and that, accordingly, the respondent should be reinstated to the bar of this state.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Petition for Reinstatement of Albert E. Putsey is hereby granted. Accordingly, he is reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

All Justices concur.

In re Putsey, 693 N.E.2d 565, 1998 Ind. LEXIS 44, 1998 WL 208787 (Ind. 1998).

Pincite

693 N.E.2d 565 (In re Putsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.