In re Purser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Purser

185 A.D.2d 1013, 587 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10032

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 18, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 185 A.D.2d 1013 (In re Purser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Purser, 185 A.D.2d 1013, 587 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 1, 1990, respondent was suspended by this court for a period of two years, effective June 1, 1990 (see, Matter of Purser, 161 AD2d 826). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Levine, J. P., Mercure, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 1, 1990, respondent was suspended by this court for a period of two years, effective June 1, 1990 (see, Matter of Purser, 161 AD2d 826). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Levine, J. P., Mercure, Mahoney, Casey and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A.D.2d 1013, 587 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-purser-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack