In re Pulis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pulis

242 A.D. 709

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provisions directing payment by the receiver, and by inserting therein a provision granting leave to respondent to sue the receiver, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that, in the circumstances shown, the respondent should proceed by action against the receiver to establish its claim. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by striking out the provisions directing payment by the receiver, and by inserting therein a provision granting leave to respondent to sue the receiver, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that, in the circumstances shown, the respondent should proceed by action against the receiver to establish its claim. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

In re Pulis, 242 A.D. 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 709 (In re Pulis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.