in Re: Puffer-Sweiven, Inc.
This text of in Re: Puffer-Sweiven, Inc. (in Re: Puffer-Sweiven, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-04-000288-CV & 13-04-000293-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
13-04-00288-CV
IN RE PUFFER-SWEIVEN, INC.
___________ _______________________________________________________
13-04-00293-CV
IN RE FLOWSERVE U.S., INC., ET AL.
___________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Puffer-Sweiven, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 9, 2004. Relators, Flowserve U.S., Inc., et al., filed a similar petition for writ of mandamus on June 15, 2004. The petitions were consolidated by order of the Court on June 23, 2004. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petitions for writ of mandamus, and the response, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petitions for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the petitions for writ of mandamus are DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 16th day of July, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Puffer-Sweiven, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-puffer-sweiven-inc-texapp-2004.