In re Puffer

20 F. Cas. 31, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 43
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 F. Cas. 31 (In re Puffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Puffer, 20 F. Cas. 31, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 43 (N.D.N.Y. 1868).

Opinion

HALL, District Judge.

The objections filed by the creditor are objections to the bankrupt’s discharge, and it appears from the register’s statement that the proper adjudication of bankruptcy was made; that the creditor proved his debt, and that an assignee was appointed. The register has no authority to decide questions arising upon objections properly urged against the bankrupt’s discharge, and such questions are to be determined by the district judge, after the bankrupt has applied for his discharge under section twenty-nine of the bankrupt act [14 Stat. 531). Even if these objections were sufficient in form and substance they would not stay the proceedings before the register, and, though they are. in part, at least, clearly insufficient in form and certainty, it is not necessary now to decide how far they are insufficient, as the question is not properly before me. .The register will proceed, notwithstanding these objections. If the creditor desires an examination of the bankrupt with a view to using such examination on opposing his discharge, or for any other purpose, he can proceed under district court rule twenty-six, which does not require the same particularity and certainty of statement which is required when the discharge is opposed.

Objections overruled, so far as the register’s proceedings are concerned, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Graves
24 F. 550 (N.D. New York, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 31, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-puffer-nynd-1868.