in Re Prudence Degail Daniels Bailey

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Prudence Degail Daniels Bailey

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 8, 2010·No. 14-10-00223-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 8, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00223-CV

____________

IN RE PRUDENCE DEGAIL BAILEY DANIELS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 12, 2010, Relator, Prudence Degail Bailey Daniels, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

On March 31, 2010, relator filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because the case had been settled. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 8, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00223-CV

____________

IN RE PRUDENCE DEGAIL BAILEY DANIELS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 12, 2010, Relator, Prudence Degail Bailey Daniels, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

On March 31, 2010, relator filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because the case had been settled. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Brown.

in Re Prudence Degail Daniels Bailey, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

in Re Prudence Degail Daniels Bailey (in Re Prudence Degail Daniels Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.