In Re Proving the Will of Granacher
66 N.E. 1109, 174 N.Y. 504, 12 Bedell 504, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1356
Opinion
.Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the findings of fact by the surrogate having been affirmed unanimously by the Appellate Division, we are prevented from, examining the questions argued ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Proving the Will of Granacher, 66 N.E. 1109, 174 N.Y. 504, 12 Bedell 504, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1356 (N.Y. 1903).
66 N.E. 1109 (In Re Proving the Will of Granacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Kleefeld
433 N.E.2d 521 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
In re the Probate of the Will of Christensen
197 Misc. 152 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1950)
In re the Estate of Breckwoldt
170 Misc. 883 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Dorrity
118 Misc. 725 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1922)
Estate of Johnson
2 Coffey 425 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1903)