In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Hill
241 A.D. 911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Motion for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. We think that the charge to the effect that where the proof of undue influence is based on circumstantial evidence, such evidence must be such as to make the inference of its exercise irresistible, was erroneous. Nevertheless, it was not of sufficient importance in view of the entire charge and all the proof upon the trial to require a reversal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Hill, 241 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 911 (In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Probate of the Will of Tropper
286 A.D. 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
In re the Probate of the Will of Phillips
193 Misc. 1046 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)