In Re Prothro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Prothro

27 A.3d 1210, 208 N.J. 340, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 945

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 5, 2011

DocketD-148 September Term 2010, 068838

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 A.3d 1210 (In Re Prothro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Prothro, 27 A.3d 1210, 208 N.J. 340, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 945 (N.J. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-061, concluding that PHILIP C. PROTHRO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be disciplined for violating RPC 8.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a disciplinary authority), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP C. PROTHRO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI