In Re Protest of Frick-Reid Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Protest of Frick-Reid Supply Co.

287 P. 997, 143 Okla. 96

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 6, 1930

DocketNo. 20167

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 287 P. 997 (In Re Protest of Frick-Reid Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Protest of Frick-Reid Supply Co., 287 P. 997, 143 Okla. 96 (Okla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an attempt to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review entered on the 28th day of January, 1929. Notice of appeal was duly given as required by law, and on the 23rd day of February, 1929, a transcript of the proceedings in the Court of Tax Review was filed in this court. The cause is now reached for final determination by this court, and upon examination of the record in this case it is disclosed that no petition in error has been tiled in this court, setting forth wherein it is claimed the Court of Tax Review committed error in the judgment sought to have reviewed, as required Initiative Act No. 100.

"That portion of Initiative Act No. 100 requiring the party appealing to file in said cause with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a petition in error within ten days after the filing of the transcript on appeal, is mandatory, and where the same is not complied with, the appeal will be dismissed by this court upon its attention being called thereto." In re Magnolia Petroleum Co., 138 Okla. 205, 280 P. 574.

No petition in error having been filed in *Page 97 this court, there is nothing before this court for review, and the appeal is dismissed.

Note. — See "Taxation," 37 Cyc. p. 1115, n. 88.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an attempt to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review entered on the 28th day of January, 1929. Notice of appeal was duly given as required by law, and on the 23rd day of February, 1929, a transcript of the proceedings in the Court of Tax Review was filed in this court. The cause is now reached for final determination by this court, and upon examination of the record in this case it is disclosed that no petition in error has been tiled in this court, setting forth wherein it is claimed the Court of Tax Review committed error in the judgment sought to have reviewed, as required Initiative Act No. 100.

"That portion of Initiative Act No. 100 requiring the party appealing to file in said cause with the Clerk of the Supreme Court a petition in error within ten days after the filing of the transcript on appeal, is mandatory, and where the same is not complied with, the appeal will be dismissed by this court upon its attention being called thereto." In re Magnolia Petroleum Co., 138 Okla. 205, 280 P. 574.

No petition in error having been filed in *Page 97 this court, there is nothing before this court for review, and the appeal is dismissed.

Note. — See "Taxation," 37 Cyc. p. 1115, n. 88.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 P. 997, 143 Okla. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-protest-of-frick-reid-supply-co-okla-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack