In re Prosser

388 F. App'x 101
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 23, 2010·No. No. 08-3894·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge.

Greenlight Capital Qualified, L.P., Greenlight Capital, L.P., and Greenlight Capital Offshore, Ltd. (collectively “Green-light”) appeal an order of the district court affirming the order of the bankruptcy court denying Greenlight’s objection to a proof of claim filed by Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”).1

Inasmuch as the district court recited the factual background to this dispute in its Memorandum Opinion, we find it unnecessary to repeat that background here. See In re Prosser, 2008 WL 3979476 (D.Vi. Aug.22, 2008). The gist of Greenlight’s argument here is that, pursuant to V.I. CODE ANN. Title 9, § 39(c),2 stock in the Virgin Islands Community Bank (“VICB”) owned by Jeffrey Prosser, the debtor and a director of the VICB, was non-transfer-rable and therefore could not be held as collateral for BPPR’s loan to Prosser. We disagree. As the district court noted, Section 39(c) speaks only to the qualification and regulation of bank directors. Id. at [102] *3. Thus, the district court correctly held that “[n]othing in that section prevents the shareholder from using the stock as collateral to secure a loan.” Id. at *2.

Accordingly, we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion without further elaboration.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Prosser, 388 F. App'x 101 (3d Cir. 2010).

388 F. App'x 101 (In re Prosser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related