In re Prospect Heights Housing Development Fund Corp.

91 A.D.3d 956, 937 N.Y.2d 620
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the evidence did not establish that the appellant Linda Caldwell was a member of the petitioner’s board of directors (hereinafter the board) dur[957]*957ing any relevant time period. Moreover, even if the appellant Denise Taylor were a member of the board at the time that the board approved the sale of the subject property, the evidence established that the other three members of the board approved that sale in compliance with Not-For-Profit Corporation Law § 510 (a). Further, the evidence established that the terms of the sale were fair and reasonable, and in the furtherance of the petitioner’s purpose and the interests of its members (see N-PCL 511 [d]; Scher v Yeshivath Makowa Corp., 54 AD3d 839 [2008]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Florio, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Prospect Heights Housing Development Fund Corp., 91 A.D.3d 956, 937 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

91 A.D.3d 956 (In re Prospect Heights Housing Development Fund Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of East Midwood Jewish Ctr., Inc. (Levitt)
2025 NY Slip Op 00321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Mount Manresa
134 A.D.3d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)