In re Propping
This text of 149 A.D. 957 (In re Propping) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These proceedings will be dismissed provided that the attorney within ten days pay, without conditions by him, §125 (conceded by him to be due and which he has previously offered to pay), without prejudice to the respective claims of the parties against each other. By this decision the court does not intend any reflection upon the good faith or integrity of the attorney. Hirschberg, Burr, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., is of opinion that the §125 should be paid unconditionally, without prejudice as to the balance; that the matter should not be determined in this proceeding, which should be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 A.D. 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-propping-nyappdiv-1912.