In re Proposal or Plan of Mortgage Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Proposal or Plan of Mortgage Commission

251 A.D. 848, 298 N.Y.S. 486, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 848 (In re Proposal or Plan of Mortgage Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Proposal or Plan of Mortgage Commission, 251 A.D. 848, 298 N.Y.S. 486, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding involving a proposal or plan of the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York to exercise certain of its limited powers with respect to a certain mortgage covering premises known as 8817 Bay Parkway, Borough of Brooklyn, securing mortgage investments guaranteed by Lawyers Title and Guaranty Company and designated as Mortgage No. 223,761 of such company, order granting the motion of the Title Guarantee and Trust Company, as trustee, that- Rose Lutz, owner, comply with the final order in that proceeding entered December 24, 1936, within ten days, and in the event that she fail to comply, that so much of the final order as directs the trustee to enter into an extension agreement with her be vacated and annulled, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and__disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding involving a proposal or plan of the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York to exercise certain of its limited powers with respect to a certain mortgage covering premises known as 8817 Bay Parkway, Borough of Brooklyn, securing mortgage investments guaranteed by Lawyers Title and Guaranty Company and designated as Mortgage No. 223,761 of such company, order granting the motion of the Title Guarantee and Trust Company, as trustee, that- Rose Lutz, owner, comply with the final order in that proceeding entered December 24, 1936, within ten days, and in the event that she fail to comply, that so much of the final order as directs the trustee to enter into an extension agreement with her be vacated and annulled, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and__disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 848, 298 N.Y.S. 486, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-proposal-or-plan-of-mortgage-commission-nyappdiv-1937.