In re Proposal or Plan by Mortgage Commission

252 A.D. 557, 300 N.Y.S. 225, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5726

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 3, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the circumstances presented, the appellants’ interpretation of the plan of reorganization as approved by order entered May 19, 1937, was the proper one.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Under the circumstances presented, the appellants’ interpretation of the plan of reorganization as approved by order entered May 19, 1937, was the proper one.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

In re Proposal or Plan by Mortgage Commission, 252 A.D. 557, 300 N.Y.S. 225, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 557 (In re Proposal or Plan by Mortgage Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.