in Re Pronto General Agency, Ltd.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 20, 2021
No. 04-20-00434-CV
IN RE PRONTO GENERAL AGENCY, LTD.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
On September 4, 2020, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, the record, and the response filed by the real party in interest, this court concludes Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on January 20, 2021.
_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of January, 2021.
_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CV01852, styled Red McCombs Ford (Plaintiff) v. Olivia Moreno Rodriguez and Eric Rafael Castorena (Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs) v. Pronto General Agency, Ltd. and CEM Insurance Company (Defendants and Third-Party Defendants), pending in the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Pronto General Agency, Ltd. (in Re Pronto General Agency, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.