in Re: Priscila Briseno

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 2022·No. 05-22-01125-CV·Published

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Filed October 27, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01125-CV

IN RE PRISCILA BRISENO, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-00330-D

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Partida-Kipness, and Justice Smith Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Relator’s October 19, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus seeks relief from

the trial court’s order reinstating the case. Relator’s petition fails to comply with the

rules concerning the requirements for filing a petition for writ of mandamus. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). Accordingly, we deny relator’s request for mandamus relief.

See In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding).

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE

221125F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Priscila Briseno, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Priscila Briseno (in Re: Priscila Briseno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Butler
270 S.W.3d 757 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)