In Re Printless Previews
This text of In Re Printless Previews (In Re Printless Previews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE PRINTLESS PREVIEWS,
____________________
2011-1273 (Reexamination Nos. 90/007996 and 90/009,092) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN JEFFREY EICHMANN, Dovel & Luner, LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was GREGORY S. DOVEL.
BENJAMIN D.M. WOOD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L.R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 8, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Printless Previews, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-printless-previews-cafc-2012.