In re Prince
This text of 97 A.D.2d 491 (In re Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application by petitioner, a disbarred attorney, to (1) stay the investigation of said petitioner, which has been undertaken by the respondent Grievance Committee and (2) stay and enjoin the respondent Grievance Committee from taking any testimony from respondent Melvin Pine and enjoining him from so giving testimony. Application denied and proceeding dismissed. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.2d 491, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-prince-nyappdiv-1983.