in Re: Prince Brown, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 2, 2010
Docket06-10-00158-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Prince Brown, Jr. (in Re: Prince Brown, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Prince Brown, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-10-00158-CR

                                                    IN RE:  PRINCE BROWN, JR.

                                                     Original Mandamus Proceeding

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

            As best as we can understand from his rather convoluted petition for relief, Prince Brown, Jr., an inmate incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, proceeding pro se, petitions this Court, requesting that we order the named respondent, Joe Black, the Criminal District Attorney of Harrison County, to produce and provide him with copies of the arrest offense reports from several of Brown’s arrests.[1] 

            In order to be entitled to mandamus relief in an action such as this, “the relator must establish two essential requirements:  (1) that the act sought to be compelled is purely ministerial, as opposed to discretionary or judicial in nature, and (2) no other adequate remedy at law is available.”  Stearnes v. Clinton, 780 S.W.2d 216, 219 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989).  Brown has not provided us with a record that shows that he has made any request of the trial court to perform a nondiscretionary act.  See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.––Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).

            Brown’s petition requests relief which this Court lacks jurisdiction to grant.  The petition requests relief against Black.  This Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a county attorney or a district attorney.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004).  Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          September 1, 2010

Date Decided:             September 2, 2010

Do Not Publish



[1]Brown does not seek the arrest offense reports relating to any appeal pending before this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Stearnes v. Clinton
780 S.W.2d 216 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Prince Brown, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-prince-brown-jr-texapp-2010.