in Re Prime Insurance Company
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00490-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam
On October 16, 2014, this Court conditionally granted a petition for writ of
mandamus filed by Prime Insurance Company (“Prime”) seeking to enforce a forum
selection clause. See In re Prime Ins. Co., No. 13-14-00490-CV, 2014 WL 5314514, at
*1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Oct. 16, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Specifically,
we directed the trial court to vacate its orders denying Prime's motions to dismiss the
underlying lawsuit and to sign an order granting Prime's motion to dismiss the underlying
lawsuit. See id. at *12.
On October 31, 2014, real parties in interest, RZQ, L.L.C., Hameed Quraishi, M.D.,
Rafath Quraishi, M.D., Aadam Quraishi, and Advanced Medical Imaging, L.L.C., filed a motion for rehearing. That same day, Prime filed an “Unopposed Emergency Motion for
Temporary Relief” through which it seeks to stay trial court proceedings pending
disposition of the motion for rehearing. According to Prime, the trial court has set a
hearing for November 4, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. on Prime’s motion to dismiss, despite this
Court’s ruling, and appellees have served Prime with a subpoena duces tecum requesting
that Prime produce a witness and documents, at that same hearing, pertaining to other
claims or lawsuits involving Prime policies over a four-year period of time.
We assume that the forementioned trial court proceedings must have been
scheduled in error because we are confident that the trial court and parties would not
intentionally violate this Court’s directive. Accordingly, the Court, having examined and
fully considered the foregoing sequence of events, is of the opinion that Prime’s motion
to stay all trial court proceedings should be granted. The emergency motion for temporary
relief is hereby GRANTED, and the trial court proceedings are ordered STAYED pending
further order of this Court, or until the motion for rehearing is finally decided. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is
effective until the case is finally decided.”).
The Court further requests that Prime file a response to the real parties’ motion for
rehearing. Such response should be due in the offices of this Court within ten days from
the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of November, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Prime Insurance Company (in Re Prime Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.